Change for our children. Change for our staff. Change for our safety.
4 out of 9 Board of Education candidates do not see education as a top priority
Results from our
Candidate-Community Survey
Respondent Demographics
Community Priority Summary
Quotes from the Community
"DPS exists courtesy of taxpayers to educate students in basic skills such as reading, writing and math. That is your sole purpose and obligation, full stop."
"For my entire life, all I have heard is school don’t enough money than we legalized weed. Learn to budget properly."
"I do not trust the board and superintendent (and his ridiculous raise) with additional resources at this time"
"It's not a money problem, it's a spending problem. DPS' lane isn’t to fix the world. Simply Educate people and challenge them to be their best, and set them free."
"Alternative schools/placements for dangerous students who have been expelled elsewhere, to be placed until such time as they can prove they are ready and it is safe for other students and staff for them to attend regular in person schools."
"Create hard and fast policy to expel any student with a gun or violent tendencies toward teachers or students. Reducing suspensions does NOT equal a safer school, it only looks that way on paper. No tolerance policy for guns on or off campus anytime."
"Create standards of excellence that all students should strive to attain regardless of gender, skin color, economic background. All students can achieve excellence if they have goals that will take them from high school to the next step."
"Have a functioning DPS board that puts schools and people ahead of their own agenda, as measured by not needing a “Resign DPS” community group."
"Revise the Discipline Matrix with 100% of School Leaders approving it and approving how the District abides by it in the 1st year."
Candidate Priority Summary
At Large Seat
District 1
District 5
A word on our lousy fiscal management question:
We included a lousy question on fiscal management. But the upshot was that 25% of community respondents took the time to tell us it was a lousy question. Overwhelmingly these respondents stated that the district cannot be trusted to spend current taxpayer money, let alone additional funds. Reducing administrative spending and closing schools should have been options in our survey question. A few quotes from respondents:
- “I do not trust the board and superintendent (and his ridiculous raise) with additional resources at this time.”
- “The district is not a good steward of existing funding. I will not support tax increases until I see consistent improvement in student achievement.”
- “As a teacher in DPS, I can attest that there is a lot of wasteful spending.”
- “DPS could easily balance the budget by strong reduction in top administrative and management positions that do not add value to the students. The district has been, and continues, to be top heavy.”
Thank you for these ideas and for calling us out on a badly constructed question.